R
Group C/A Replica Racing - There must be a way!
#251
_rorym_
Posted 23 January 2008 - 06:46 PM
R
#252
_82911_
Posted 23 January 2008 - 06:54 PM
He will be slow!
Now that was cruel!
Just jokes.......
Yeah Super TT is the AMRS answer to sports sedans. I believe this would be the ideal place to run our little series....
Is anyone interested in seeing some shots of the walky? It is going in for its war paint (Telecom mobilenet colours) shortly, so if you like i will post a pic or 2 before I get a scratch on it!
Cheers Greg..
#253
Posted 23 January 2008 - 07:18 PM
#254
Posted 23 January 2008 - 07:22 PM
Yes we are interested in seeing photos of the Walky !
Yeah me too - c'mon Greg lets see the beast!
#255
_rorym_
Posted 23 January 2008 - 09:04 PM
Hah!!...Its was 290HP wasnt it????..according to some I will be as slow as a wet week!Mate ... with only 390HP avaliable.. Rory won't have to drive slow....
He will be slow!
Now that was cruel!![]()
![]()
![]()
Just jokes.......![]()
Yeah Super TT is the AMRS answer to sports sedans. I believe this would be the ideal place to run our little series....
Is anyone interested in seeing some shots of the walky? It is going in for its war paint (Telecom mobilenet colours) shortly, so if you like i will post a pic or 2 before I get a scratch on it!
Cheers Greg..
Post them Greggy!
R
#256
Posted 23 January 2008 - 09:19 PM
I know its a long way, but I'm sure everyone here would be thrilled if you could bring your 290 HP Beast (LOL) to the drag day at Heathcote.
#257
_LXChev366_
Posted 23 January 2008 - 09:52 PM
And yes AMRS runs in NSW as well. They have TV, but entry fee's are around $500+.
here ya go, a linky...
http://www.supertt.net.au/
Edited by LXChev366, 23 January 2008 - 09:54 PM.
#258
Posted 23 January 2008 - 10:02 PM
At state level, the VMRC which also comes under the AASA banner is much cheaper than the CAMS series(or ARMS) and you get more races.
The way i see it, it doesn't matter if no promoter wants a replica class, if we turn up and run with Super TT, the interest generated will be enormous, especially if we arrange for the media to be present.
#259
_rorym_
Posted 24 January 2008 - 05:39 PM
R
#260
Posted 24 January 2008 - 06:20 PM
We only have 2 tracks in SA, Mallala runs CAMS events and AIR runs the AMRS (although the track is in such a bad state they couldnt run it last year.... thanks BOB
All we need is enough cars at the one event to make it a goer really.
#261
_rorym_
Posted 24 January 2008 - 07:31 PM
R
#262
Posted 23 April 2008 - 12:38 AM
Some kind of registar needs to be created so that we avoid the inevitable multiples of the same car being made. Initially I was thinking we start it on this website, we create a new topic (called something like Historic Replica Register) have it pinned in the Circuit Racing section, and maybe lock it so only a mod group can edit it. People who are interested can pm one of the mods and they can be added to the list (if the car being replicated has not already been taken), this will stop it being a free for all and any arguments on who runs what. If it takes off, we can get serious and register a domain name and setup some kind of web presence (a website perhaps) that people can visit and go from there. Obviously this is subject to approval from the mod team so I'll pm Tiny and see what he thinks.
I'm open to suggestions, so fire away
The other thing that we need to do is look at selecting a "point of contact" or 2 in each state to try and spread the word to people who may not have internet access but are interested.
I'm willing to put my hand up for SA - looking for some suggestions from the other states..
so what does everyone think?
cheers,
Sam
#263
_82911_
Posted 23 April 2008 - 07:26 AM
Put me down for NSW.
TWR Walkinshaw replica or HRT Replica?
Waddaya rekon?
#264
_rorym_
Posted 23 April 2008 - 07:29 AM
R
Edited by rorym, 23 April 2008 - 07:29 AM.
#265
Posted 24 April 2008 - 10:29 AM
Cheers,
Mick
#266
_82911_
Posted 24 April 2008 - 11:14 AM
I initially thought HRT..... But lately i have been thinking more towards TWR, i suppose it is a bonus that 90% of the kit on the car is from that very car! (TWR car). The rest is from the Barbagallo car....there is no way I'm donig a replica of that thing! It was pink!
Cheers Greg
#268
Posted 25 April 2008 - 10:21 AM
#269
_LJGTRXU179_
Posted 27 April 2008 - 09:13 PM
I currently race an LJ GTR in the Historic NC class. Obviously, your chain caught my eye and I have been observing since with great interest.
A few comments from an outsider:
1) I think the register is a great idea, however have you thought about what will happen when two or more people want to build the same replica? How will a decision be made on who has the right to build the replica and on what will such a decision be based? A first in best dressed system would not work long term, with many becoming disillusioned once the "favourites" are taken.
Depending on your aim (whether it be to replicate the racing of the period or to simply have access to look-a-likes as the real things are outside the normal mortals price range) you need to establish what would provide full grids at race meetings. Nobody enjoys competing against four other cars. I think you should tend towards replicars (an SL dressed as an SLR 5000) not replicas (a Brock Torana).
2) How are you going to ensure parity between the faster Group A cars and Group C? One of the issues we are facing at the moment is maintaining interest in the Nb class for the pre-65 cars. With the Nc cars getting quicker and quicker, those interested in winning, not just participating are spending more and more to get those tenths. Had you thought about potentially running split grids/split championships?
The idea is excellent and something that I have suggested that we need to implement at our club (HTCAV) to ensure the future of our racing. I am one of the youngest racers in the club (by a good 20+ years) and Group A/C replica racing would entice another generation to join.
Just my opinion guys. Either way good work so far!
Stu-
#270
Posted 28 April 2008 - 10:16 PM
Thanks for the input, its great to get the view of someone already racing in an established historic class.
I agree the process of selecting who replicates what cars is going to be hard to manage in the long term, and requires more discussion from interested parties at this early stage to try and guage what is the best system... I think at least initially running cars that replicate something would be the go as I feel its part of what would make the class more interesting (to both competitors and spectators). Obviously if the interest is there, I'm sure that things can be fine tuned by way of a sub class or something.... We do want to encourage as many people as possible.... Any one else want to comment?
The parity thing between group c and a will always be an issue, I dont think you can make them even, once again it will just come down to a class points thing I think. To my mind this whole thing is more directed towards people being able to build the car they want to, and having a class to run it in. The fact that we have to run this within sport sedans (at least initially) will mean that often there will be much quicker cars running with us anyway. Once again if there are numbers and the promotors allow it, we may get our own race (like commodore cup).
Were you looking at running your LJ or something else?
keep the comments coming
cheers,
Sam
#271
_rorym_
Posted 29 April 2008 - 08:16 AM
R
#272
Posted 30 April 2008 - 04:35 PM
http://www.australia...cle_view/110659
#273
_rorym_
Posted 30 April 2008 - 05:39 PM
R
#274
_82911_
Posted 30 April 2008 - 06:54 PM
Stock brakes, fake drop tank, standard shock towers, stock diff, stock hubs with ally extensions on them..... fake groupC side pipe.... horrible alloy press bent rollcage (look at the kinks in the front legs).
Its neat... YES... but wouldn't last 10 laps if leaned on heavily....
A good example of the "look" though...
#275
_rorym_
Posted 01 May 2008 - 02:55 PM
R
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users









